Cases 1 - 10 of 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Fields v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Karen J. Fields
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fields v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fields
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burton et al v. Winn et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Logan Burton, Marc Zdrojewski, James Wright and others
Defendant:
Cody Clay Winn, Market Modern, LLC and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fields v. CareSource Management Services LLC
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Betty Jo Fields
Defendant:
CareSource Management Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Field v. 351 North Avon, Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv02302
Plaintiff:
Cailynn Field
Defendant:
351 North Avon, Inc., George Sideris, Anastassios Alexandris and others
Fields v. Wilhite et al
as 2:2023cv03755
Plaintiff:
Gerald Fields
Defendant:
Detective Wilhite, Detective Moore, Parole Officer Gaumer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03277
Plaintiff:
William Fields and Lee Ann Fields
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Heard v. Field Core
as 1:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Patricia C. Heard
Defendant:
Field Core
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
