Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Finnell v. DeWine et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kyle Finnell
Defendant:
Govern Mike DeWine, Lt. Jon Husted, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finnell v. Eppans et al
as 1:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Timothy Eppans, Sgt. J. Franklin, Nicholas Pugh and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Finnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron et al v. The Ohio Medical Board et al
as 1:2018cv00882
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson, Richard Elliott, Adrian Lilly and others
Defendant:
Anita M. Steinbergh, DO, Richard Whitehouse, The Ohio Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron et al v. Hamilton County Clerk's Office et al
as 1:2018cv00699
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson, Richard Elliott, Adrian Lilly and others
Defendant:
Hamilton County Clerk's Office, Hon. Mark Schweikert, Aftab Pureval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron et al v. AETNA et al
as 1:2018cv00631
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson, Richard Elliott, Adrian Lilly and others
Defendant:
Marguette National Life Insurance Company, Medicaid Coventry Care Coventry Health Care, Blue Cross Blue Shield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Aaron et al v. O'Connor
as 1:2018cv00599
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson, Richard Elliott, Adrian Lilly and others
Defendant:
Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finnell v. Metz et al
as 1:2018cv00152
Plaintiff:
Kyle Finnell
Defendant:
J. Metz and Beth A. Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finnell v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00268
Petitioner:
Kyle Finnell
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Finnell-Acost v. Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
as 1:2010cv00520
Plaintiff:
Benita Finnell-Acost
Defendant:
Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
