Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Reese v. Bureau of Alcohol
as 23-30033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Caleb Reese, Firearms Policy Coalition, Incorporated, Second Amendment Foundation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Andrews v. McCraw
as 22-10898
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Aidan Andrews, Jordyn Blakey and Firearms Policy Coalition, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellant:
Steven C. McCraw, in his official capacity as Director of the Texas Department of Public Safety
Andrews et al v. McCraw et al
as 3:2021cv02767
Plaintiff:
Aidan Andrews, Jordyn Blakey and Firearms Policy Coalition Inc
Defendant:
Steven C McCraw, John Forrest, Richard E Glaser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews et al v. McCraw et al
as 4:2021cv01245
Plaintiff:
Aidan Andrews, Jordyn Blakey and Firearms Policy Coalition Inc
Defendant:
Steven C McCraw, John Forrest, Richard E Glaser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese et al v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives et al
as 6:2020cv01438
Defendant:
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Regina Lombardo, Attorney General William P Barr and others
Plaintiff:
The Second Amendment Foundation, Caleb Reese, Joseph Granich and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0922
Jay Isaac Hollis v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-10803
Defendant / Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States and THOMAS E. BRANDON, Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Amicus Curiae:
FIREARMS POLICY FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, BRADLEY D. ROGERS, MADISON SOCIETY, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAY AUBREY ISAAC HOLLIS, Individually and as Trustee of the Jay Aubrey Isaac Hollis Revocable Living Trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
