Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Barrett Tunsil v. Harry Laurel, et al
as 23-3124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Defendant / Appellee:
HARRY LAUREL, PA-DOC Secretary/C.E.O., WELLPATH INC, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, c/o Michelle Henry and others
Defendant:
AUKER, Medical Director/Administrator, BAKER, Medical Director/Administrator, BECK, Medical Director/Administrator and others
Tunsil v. Laurel et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Defendant:
Harry Laurel, WellPath, Inc, Pennsylvania Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLICK v. MASON
as 2:2021cv00042
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JAMES SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY and others
Petitioner:
THOMAS FLICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLICK v. MASON et al
as 3:2020cv00252
Respondent:
WILLIAM SHAW, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO and BERNADETTE MASON
Petitioner:
THOMAS EDWARD FLICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flick v. Miller et al
as 1:2019cv01811
Defendant:
Mark Garman, Richard Ellers, Heather Haldeman and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Flick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLICK v. USA
as 2:2019cv01027
Petitioner:
JOHN J. FLICK
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FLICK v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00069
Defendant:
MAJOR J.R. BARROWS, SUPT. B.R. SMITH and DEPTY SUPT. B.J. SOLOMAN
Plaintiff:
LOUIS R. FLICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Flick v. Garman
as 1:2018cv02447
Defendant:
Mark Garman
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Flick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv01555
Defendant:
Nikky Paul, Douglas R. Sampsel, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson et al v. SUPT. Garman et al
as 1:2018cv01174
Petitioner:
Howard Lawson, Jonathan P. Jones and Thomas Flick
Respondent:
SUPT. Garman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
