Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gallo et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Angela Bernhardine Gallo and Lisa Antionietta Lieselotte Gallo
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Water Pollution Control Author v. Flowserve US, Inc.
as 18-1288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Water Pollution Control Authority of the City of Norwalk
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Flowserve US, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Gilbane Building Company
Flowserve US, et al v. Optimux Controls, et al
as 17-4070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOWSERVE US INC. and FLOWSERVE FCD CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
OPTIMUX CONTROLS, LLC and TRIMTECK, LLC
Defendant:
JAIME CONESA
Southern Design & Mechanical, Inc. v. Flowserve US Inc.
as 1:2016cv01003
Plaintiff:
Southern Design & Mechanical, Inc.
Defendant:
Flowserve US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CGBM 100 LLC et al v. FLOWSERVE US INC. et al
as 3:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
CGBM 100 LLC and ACCUTRANS, INC.
Defendant:
FLOWSERVE US INC., Flowserve Corporation and STERLING SHIPYARD, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Water Pollution Control Authority of the City of Norwalk v. Flowserve US Inc.
as 3:2014cv00549
Plaintiff:
Water Pollution Control Authority of the City of Norwalk
Defendant:
Flowserve US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Flowserve US Inc v. The Selmer Company et al
as 3:2011cv01068
Plaintiff:
Flowserve US Inc
Defendant:
The Selmer Company and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flowserve Corporation et al v. Ingersoll-Rand Company
as 1:2007cv05592
Plaintiff:
Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve US, Inc. and Flowserve International, Inc.
Defendant:
Ingersoll-Rand Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
