Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Williams v. Floyde et al
as 5:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Williams
Defendant:
Elizabeth Floyde, Joseph Crosswhite, Sam Winthrop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02175
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Floyd v. USA
as 1:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Hasson Lewis Floyd
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cureton v. Gray et al
as 5:2022ct03329
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton, Jr.
Defendant:
John R. Gray, Mark Flemmings, Monica Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd et al v. North Carolina State et al
as 5:2022ct03203
Plaintiff:
Tanis Floyd and Robert H. Wolfe
Defendant:
North Carolina State and Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals et al
as 5:2022ct03117
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
4th Circuit Court of Appeals, Stubbs Perdue, Attorneys at Law, Christopher Venters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MEBANE v. FLOYD et al
as 1:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
JOE FLOYD, LIEUTENANT NELSON, CORPORAL TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Ammons
as 5:2021ct03268
Plaintiff:
Solomon Nimrod Butler
Defendant:
James Floyd Ammons, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Atkinson et al
as 5:2021ct03008
Defendant:
Unit Manager Brown, Crystal Atkinson, Doctor Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Keith W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Lanehart et al
as 5:2020ct03371
Defendant:
Unit Manager Brown, Unit Manager Spivey, Sgt. Graham and others
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
