Cases 21 - 30 of 439
Duran v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jason Henry Duran
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Brad Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Floyd Murray
as 23-1201
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Floyd Murray
Guthrie v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
George Dwayne Guthrie, II
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Antonnette Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nail v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nail
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Antonnette Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knowles v. Floyd et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Antreze Deun Knowles
Defendant:
Jamie Floyd, Cameron Hughes, Neely Crowder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rhea v. Floyd et al
as 3:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Donald Rhea
Defendant:
James Floyd, Dane Barnum, Felisha Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Floyd et al
as 3:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Demetrie Wright
Defendant:
James Floyd, Dane Barnum, Felisha Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adame v. Floyd County Courthouse
as 4:2022cv00316
Petitioner:
Armando Adame, III.
Respondent:
Floyd County Courthouse and State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
