Cases 11 - 20 of 186
DEDRICK v. MCCUTHEN et al
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. DEDRICK
Defendant:
MCCUTHEN, M. CHALEUNPHONH, STEVE BUSCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
MASON JR v. WARDON
as 1:2023cv00684
Petitioner:
FLOYD M MASON JR
Respondent:
WARDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Baur et al
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Floyd Leonard Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Baur, Jule, Derick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOYD et al v. RES-CARE, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
ACYRUS FLOYD and ERICA FLOYD
Defendant:
RES-CARE, INC. and RESCARE d/b/a COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES-ADEPT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
FLOYD v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv02378
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE FLOYD
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Products Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
REITER et al v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER REITER and TIFFANY NAPIER
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARRID, BRADLEY KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIDWELL v. C/O LOCK et al
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M. KIDWELL
Defendant:
C/O LOCK, C/O LOVANS, ZELIFITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
