Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Medshape, Inc. et al v. Arthrex, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Medshape, Inc., Trilliant Surgical LLC and Encore Medical, L.P. d/b/a Enovis Foot and Ankle doing business as Enovis Foot and Ankle
Defendant:
Arthrex, Inc. and Arthrex Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
S3G Technology LLC v. Foot Locker, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Gonzalez v. Abigail et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Israel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Timothy Abigail, Metroplex Foot and Ankle and Steed, Dunhill, Reynolds, Bailey, Stephenson LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Foote v. Director, TDCJ
as 3:2022cv02430
Petitioner:
James Wesley Foote
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foote v. Director, TDCJ ***Case Transferred to Northern District***
as 6:2022cv00417
Petitioner:
James Wesley Foote
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hearn v. Big Foot Energy Services, LLC et al
as 9:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Deairreus Hearn
Defendant:
Big Foot Energy Services, LLC and Iron Mountain Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foote v. Collier et al
as 1:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
Billy Foote
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, R Chambers and H M Pederson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
