Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Medshape, Inc. et al v. Arthrex, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Medshape, Inc., Trilliant Surgical LLC, Encore Medical, L.P. d/b/a Enovis Foot and Ankle doing business as Enovis Foot and Ankle and others
Defendant:
Arthrex, Inc. and Arthrex Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
S3G Technology LLC v. Foot Locker, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
FILING ERROR
as 5:2021cv00901
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alejandro Mendoza
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Smith v. Matrix Minds, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00717
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Smith
Defendant:
Matrix Minds, LLC, d/b/a Cloud 9 Vapo Shop, Carl Foote and Matrix Minds, LLC doing business as Cloud 9 Vapo Shop
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Foot Locker Retail, Inc. as Successor in Interest to Eastbay Inc. v. John Cardenas, Texas Sports & Entertainment LLC and Showcase Athletics PLLC
as 5:2021cv00564
Plaintiff:
Eastbay, Inc. and Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Defendant:
John R. Cardenas, Texas Sports & Entertainment LLC and Showcase Athletics PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Symbology Innovations LLC v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01248
Plaintiff:
Symbology Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Aeritas, LLC v. Foot Locker, Inc.
as 6:2019cv00189
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aeritas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00416
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Withdrawal of Reference
Case name not on file
as 3:2016mc00374
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
