Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 453
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00967
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fort Wayne Community Schools v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02308
Plaintiff: Fort Wayne Community Schools
Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc., Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Fort Towson School District v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01776
Plaintiff: Fort Towson School District
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Vanir Construction Management, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00160
Plaintiff: Shoshone Bannock Tribal Court, Fort Hall Business Council and Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
Defendant: Vanir Construction Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv08060
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Sharon Rosette, et al
as 23-55166
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP
Defendant / Appellee: SHARON ROSETTE, ROSETTE & ASSOCIATES, PC and ROSETTE, LLP
Defendant: QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT YUMA INDIAN RESERVATION, ROBERT ROSETTE, RICHARD ARMSTRONG and others
FORT BELKNAPP PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al v. Ransom
as 4:2023cv00005
Petitioner: FORT BELKNAPP PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION a Fort Belknap Indian Community corporation doing business as Island Mountain Development Group and GVA Holdings, LLC
Respondent: Rashonna Ransom
Bibb County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey and Company Inc
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff: Bibb County, Alabama, Cherokee County, Alabama, City of Cullman, Alabama and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Freeman v. Burbank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01903
Plaintiff: Scott Freeman
Defendant: Russell Burbank, Stephen Hurst, Sunray Asset Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jefferson County, AL et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv06561
Plaintiff: Jefferson County, AL, CITY OF MOUNTAIN BROOK, AL, CITY OF PLEASANT GROVE, AL and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?