Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 7,906
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant: CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff: Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Pitcher et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv09813
Cross Defendant: John Pitcher, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Carolyn Pitcher
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, Barretts Minerals Inc., Brenntag North America, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant: Alfa Laval, Inc., Block Drug Company, FMC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 as Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Craig v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv00462
Defendant: Paramount Global, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Redco Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Gloria Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Bridges et al v. Eagle Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04392
Plaintiff: Lloyd Bridges Sr., Lloyd Bridges Jr., Leonard Bridges III and others
Cross Defendant: Eagle Inc., Viacom CBS, Inc., International Paper Company and others
Defendant: Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., 3M Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Northrup Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant: Foster Wheeler LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Mohr v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06081
Plaintiff: Raymond Mohr
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Crown, Cork & Seal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Crooks v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06089
Plaintiff: David Crooks
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, AO Smith Corporation, ABB Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Mary Spurlin, et al v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al
as 22-55951
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARY SPURLIN
Plaintiff: DALE M. SPURLIN
Defendant / Appellee: FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Defendant: IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Steam Turbine Company and Delaval, Inc. and DOES, 1 through 400, inclusive
Dale Spurlin, et al v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al
as 22-55897
Plaintiff / Appellant: DALE M. SPURLIN
Plaintiff: MARY SPURLIN
Defendant / Appellee: FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Defendant: IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Steam Turbine Company and Delaval, Inc. and DOES, 1 through 400, inclusive
Skudin v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00425
Plaintiff: David J. Skudin
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation and others
Cross Defendant: Tate Andale, LLC and Warren Pumps LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?