Cases 1 - 10 of 11
USA v. Francis Cox
as 19-30276
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANCIS SCHAEFFER COX
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cox v. Dodd, et al
as 19-1267
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARTIN S. GOTTESFELD
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS SCHAEFFER COX
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRY DODD and RICHARD NEFF
Cox v. Benbella Books Inc et al
as 3:2018cv03367
Defendant:
Benbella Books Inc and William Fulton
Plaintiff:
Francis Schaeffer Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF U.S. ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2018cv02657
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, AND FIREARMS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF U.S. ATTORNEYS
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS SCHAEFFER COX
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Cox v. Eberle Associates et al
as 3:2018cv00774
Defendant:
Tammy Cali, Eberle Associates, Mike Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Schaeffer Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Dodd et al
as 1:2018cv02328
Defendant:
Richard Neff, Terry Dodd, Maria Rensel and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Schaeffer Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Dodd et al
as 3:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
Francis Schaeffer Cox
Defendant:
Terry Dodd, Stitching Trust For Two, Inc, Stewart Skrill and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Cox v. Inch et al
as 3:2017cv01334
Plaintiff:
Francis Schaeffer Cox
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Gary Burgess, Kathy Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox v. Executive Office of US Attorneys et al
as 3:2017cv00611
Plaintiff:
Francis Schaeffer Cox
Defendant:
Executive Office of US Attorneys, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Cox v. True et al
as 3:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
Francis Schaeffer Cox
Defendant:
William True, Katherine Siereveld, Angela Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
