Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Harris v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Francis T. Chardo, Edward M. Marsico, Jr., Deborah E. Curcillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Taurasi et al
as 1:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Cornelius E. Harris
Defendant:
Lee Ann Taurasi, Robert Martin, Eric Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. Marsico, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Edward M. Marsico, Jr., Francis T. Chardo, Richard A. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Chambers v. Klinefelter et al
as 1:2023cv00502
Petitioner:
Eric A. Chambers
Respondent:
Superintendent Klinefelter, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Francis T. Chardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antwan Richardson v. Joseph Hartye, et al
as 21-2429
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN L. RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH F. HARTYE, BRADLEY A. WINNICK, JOHN R. CANAVAN and others
Diaz v. Curcillo et al
as 1:2019cv00718
Plaintiff:
Eric Diaz
Defendant:
Dauphin County Work Release Center, Wendy J.F. Grella, Jeena M. Riaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Taurasi et al
as 1:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Bryan Kauffman, RisMiller Law Group, LLC, Judge Richard Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius E. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Chardo
as 1:2018cv00727
Plaintiff:
Glue Wilkins
Defendant:
Francis T. Chardo, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Chardo et al
as 1:2018cv00477
Plaintiff:
Aiyda Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Francis T. Chardo, Richard A. Lewis and Bradley A. Winnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glue Wilkins v. Francis Chardo, III
as 16-1470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLUE WILKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCIS T. CHARDO, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
