Cases 1 - 10 of 647
Francisco et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02633
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Francisco and Lauren Francisco
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cashbaugh et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cashbaugh, Christopher Daniels, Anthony Dexter and others
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of and Tony Moulatsiotis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2024cv01609
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
Julie Lynch, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, Frederick D Benton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01516
Plaintiff:
Francisco Lopez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patino v. USA
as 2:2024cv10785
Petitioner:
Francisco Patino
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Contreras v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Francisco Contreras
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Landscape Forms, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Francisco Jones
Defendant:
Landscape Forms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
