Cases 1 - 10 of 16
VILLEGAS II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73329
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO VILLEGAS II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brewer v. Geerdes et al
as 4:2019cv01219
Respondent:
hector M Lopez Ortiz, Jamarcus D Godball, Christian Valdez and others
Petitioner:
Calvin Dewayne Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 9:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Respondent:
Sharon D Allen, John D. Stubblefield, Mitchell D. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 3:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Sharon D. Allen, John D. Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 4:2017cv01163
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Sharon D. Allen, John D. Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VILLEGAS v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, et al
as 2:2014cv07337
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO VILLEGAS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, INC., RALPH WOODWARD, M.D., ABU AHSAN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw et al v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv00440
Defendant:
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company , Lone Star Milk Transport, Inc. and Francisco Villegas
Plaintiff:
Darlene M. Shaw , Brenda F. Smothers , Roland D. Smothers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Francisco Villegas, et al
as 13-4677
Petitioner:
In re: FRANCISCO VILLEGAS
Respondent:
CHARLIE WARREN, Administrator and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
In re: Francisco Villega
as 13-4395
Petitioner:
In re: FRANCISCO VILLEGAS
Respondent:
CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR
Mathis v. Bermudez et al
as 4:2012cv02837
Plaintiff:
Billy Mathis
Defendant:
Jimmy Bermudez, Sebastian Gallegos, Quintin Glaze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
