Cases 1 - 10 of 22
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cline v. Burke, et al
as 23-1680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRON CLINE
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK K. BURKE, ANDREA LEVY, FREDERICK RUSHTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bauersachs, et al v. Gaziano, et al
as 22-1772
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ANDREW BAUERSACHS and MARCIELI BAUERSACHS
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK M. GAZIANO, Associate Justice of Mass Supreme Judicial Court, DAVID A. LOWY, Associate Justice of Mass Supreme Judicial Court, ELSPETH B. CYPHER, Associate Justice of Mass Supreme Judicial Court and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bishay v. Ricciuti, et al
as 22-1033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAHIG F. BISHAY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL D. RICCIUTI, in his individual capacity, DIANA L. MALDONADO, in her individual capacity, JAMES R. LEMIRE, in his individual capacity and others
Bauersachs et al v. Gaziano et al
as 1:2021cv11866
Plaintiff:
Mark Bauersachs and Marcieli Bauersachs
Defendant:
Frank M. Gaziano, David A. Lowy, Elspeth B Cypher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishay et al v. Ricciuti et al
as 1:2021cv11227
Defendant:
Arent Fox LLP, Michael D Ricciuti, Diana L Maldonado and others
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Bahig F. Bishay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
