Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Doe, et al v. Shibinette We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1058
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEBORAH A. TAYLOR, as guardian for Scott Stephen Johnstone, HUGGINS HOSPITAL, MARY HITCHCOCK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant / Appellant: LORI SHIBINETTE, Commissioner, NH Department of Health and Human Services, official capacity
Defendant: NEW HAMPSHIRE CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT DIVISION, MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, North Conway and ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL, Nashua
3Rd Party Defendant: HONORABLE DAVID D. KING
Kopkin v. Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv12103
Defendant: Emmanuel Dulac, Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., Badrul A Chowdhury and others
Plaintiff: Kenneth Kopkin
Rounds v. United States Dept. of Justice, et al
as 20-1840
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LINDSEY GRAHAM, United States Senator, JEFFREY ROSEN, United States Deputy Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: IRVING FRANKLIN ROUNDS, JR.
DaSilva v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., et al
as 20-1693
Defendant: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a/k/a MERS, ARGENT MORTGAGE CO., LLC, ASSET BACKED SECURITIES CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as certificate trustee on behalf of Bosco Credit II Trust Series 2010-1 and FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREIA DASILVA
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al
as 20-1119
Petitioner: GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTIN AVILA LUCAS, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and JACKY CELICOURT, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Interested Party: JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, YOLANDA SMITH, Superintendent of the Suffolk County House of Corrections and others
Respondent / Appellee: JAMES MCHENRY, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, YOLANDA SMITH, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, LORI STREETER, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1037
Respondent / Appellee: ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, LORI STREETER, Superintendent of the Franklin County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Petitioner / Appellant: JACKY CELICOURT, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTINE AVILA LUCAS, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Abernathy v. Anderson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1880
Defendant: THOMAS A. GROBLEWSKI, BRUCE GELB, MICHAEL RUMERY and others
Defendant / Appellee: KRYSTAL ANDERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANKLIN B. ABERNATHY
Reid, et al v. Donelan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1787
Respondent / Appellee: JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, CHRISTOPHER J. DONELAN, Sheriff, Franklin County, Massachusetts and others
Interested Party: JOHN HAWKINSON
Petitioner / Appellant: LEO FELIX CHARLES, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, ROBERT WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and MARK ANTHONY REID
US v. Franklin
as 19-1589
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: CURTESSA MONET FRANKLIN
Goldman v. US
as 19-1398
Defendant / Appellant: FRANKLIN M. GOLDMAN
Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?