Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Franklin v. Bhinder et al
as 1:2018cv00849
Plaintiff:
Marlon Franklin
Defendant:
Atam Bhinder and TST Solutions LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Franklin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00567
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Franklin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bartlett v. Community Mental Health Allegan et al
as 1:2018cv00411
Plaintiff:
Angel Bartlett
Defendant:
Community Mental Health Allegan, Community Mental Health Kalamazoo, Kalamazoo Psychiatric Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bartlett v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
Angel Bartlett
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Allegan County Court, Kalamazoo County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Costco Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00951
Plaintiff:
Charles Franklin, Jr.
Defendant:
Costco Corporation and Global Enterprise Marketing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clayton #250554 v. Michigan Department of Corrections & Contractors et al
as 1:2016cv00830
Plaintiff:
Franklin Clayton #250554
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections & Contractors, Robert Napel, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon #850454 v. Haynes-Love et al
as 1:2016cv00657
Plaintiff:
Dwight Franklin Blackmon #850454
Defendant:
Unknown Haynes-Love, Spencer Burke, Unknown Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin #204117 v. Berghuis
as 1:2015cv00870
Petitioner:
Alvin Franklin #204117, Jr.
Respondent:
Mary Berghuis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00463
Plaintiff:
Christine Lin Franklin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
