Cases 21 - 30 of 54
McCall v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2018cv01261
Defendant:
Nationstar, Carliesle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich Co., L.P.A., Bradley P. Toman and others
Plaintiff:
Bondary McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boston v. Nationstar Mortgage et al
as 2:2018cv00283
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Boston
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage , Franklin County Sheriff and Bethany L. Suttinger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Castile v. Franklin County Sheriff
as 2:2018cv00226
Plaintiff:
Isaac Castile, III
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvan v. Franklin County Sheriff Department
as 2:2017cv01053
Plaintiff:
Arturo Galvan
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff Department and Bureau of Alcohol, Tabacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Fritz et al
as 2:2017cv00688
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowen
Defendant:
Brian G. Fritz , Franklin County Sheriff's Office and Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Perry et al.
as 2:2016cv01190
Plaintiff:
Shaun A. Bryant
Defendant:
Perry and Warden, Franklin County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Triplett-Fazzone v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv01016
Plaintiff:
Ragna Triplett-Fazzone
Defendant:
United States of America, The State of Ohio, City of Columbus Division of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinkle v. Franklin County Sheriff
as 2:2016cv00900
Plaintiff:
Joseph Todd Hinkle
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Berman v. Lot Number 297, in Berwick Heights No. 2 et al
as 2:2016cv00508
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Berman
Defendant:
Lot Number 297, in Berwick Heights No. 2, Michael B. Coleman , Frankie L. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
