Cases 11 - 20 of 229
SHERMAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06895
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
FRED SHERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Peters v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00651
Petitioner:
Fred Peters
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERS v. GALIPEAU
as 1:2022cv01527
Petitioner:
FRED PETERS
Respondent:
JOHN R. GALIPEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COLOSSUS TRADING LLC v. YUKI EXPORT CORP., et al
as 1:2022cv01166
Plaintiff:
COLOSSUS TRADING LLC
Defendant:
YUKI EXPORT CORP., dba HEARTE INTERNATIONAL CO.,, HIRO IDE, YUKI EXPORT CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
BENAVIDES v. CLARK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
FRED L. BENAVIDES
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY JAIL and JAMEY NOEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Chambers et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Brad Chambers, General Clif Todey, Joel Gorelick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Hupfer et al
as 1:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Kyle Hupfer, Chuck Williams, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERS v. REAGLE
as 1:2021cv02858
Petitioner:
FRED PETERS
Respondent:
D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WEISS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02807
Plaintiff:
FRED B. WEISS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finnegan v. Foerg et al
as 3:2021cv00783
Defendant:
Jeffery K Richwine, Dale J Starkes, Phillip Foerg and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
