Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Williams, et al v. Ludwick et al
as 4:2016cv00460
Defendant:
Nick Ludwick, William Sperfslage, Mark Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Terry J Williams and Michael A Bartnick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hever et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv04218
Plaintiff:
Randy Hever , Fred Koopmans and Hever & Koopmans
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta Seeds, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
High Bear et al v. Year et al
as 5:2015cv04051
Plaintiff:
Shelley High Bear and William High Bear
Defendant:
Fred Year and Robert Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00124
Petitioner:
Fred Carl Chapman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Haider v. Huckins et al
as 4:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Stephen LaMar Haider
Defendant:
Gail Huckins, Fred Heune, Sean Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Branstad et al
as 4:2013cv00253
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson, Gerald Elton Busch, William Cubbage and others
Defendant:
Terry E Branstad, Kim Reynolds, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rourke et al v. Johnson and Johnson
as 5:2013cv04009
Plaintiff:
Pamela Rourke and Fred Rourke
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watson v. Starling et al
as 3:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Wardell Watson
Defendant:
Fred Starling and Faith Temple Church of God in Christ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2012cv04006
Plaintiff:
Tommy Fred Wright
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
