Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Beinkampen v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv04679
Plaintiff:
Fred Perry Beinkampen
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eclipse IP LLC v. Fred Perry USA, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00357
Plaintiff:
Eclipse IP LLC
Defendant:
Fred Perry USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jimmy Logan v. Officer Emerson, et al
as 13-1226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY D. LOGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER EMERSON and FRED PERRY, Sergeant
Fred Perry (Holdings) Limited v. Lands' End, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05659
Plaintiff:
Fred Perry (Holdings) Limited
Defendant:
Lands' End, Inc. and Sears Holdings Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bjorklund v. Miller, et al
as 11-5037
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICK BJORKLUND
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDI MILLER, individually and in her official capacity as former Chairperson and current Member of the Tulsa County Public Facilites Authority
Defendant:
JOHN SMALIGO, Chairman of the Tulsa County Public Facilites Authority, JAMES C. ORBISON, Vice-Chairman of the Tulsa County Public Facilites Authority and FRED PERRY, Secretary of the Tulsa County Public Facilites Authority
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
