Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Banks v. FCC Forrest City et al
as 2:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI - Forrest City, Arkansas Education Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks v. Haynes
as 2:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Anthony Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 2:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks v. Hanks et al
as 2:2012cv00221
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Hanks, John B Fox, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Outlaw
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
T C Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Banks v Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Johnson, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Timothy C Outlaw, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Warden
as 2:2012cv00139
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
T C Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Fenner et al
as 2:2012cv00138
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tracie Fenner, Ricki Foreman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2012cv00137
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, T C Outlaw, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.