Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Jones, STARLING, COFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick DixonIn re: Frederick Dixon
as 23-10216
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Dixon v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Frederick Douglas Dixon
Defendant:
Jones, Starling, Cofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Warden JONES, JONES, MOHAMMED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18939
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS BURLESON, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Warden JONES, Warden WISZ, Nurse JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Warden JONES, Former Warden BLACK, MS HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv03615
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Douglas Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
