Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canady v. Hansley et al
as 5:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Fredrick L. Canady
Defendant:
FNU Hansley, FNU Honeycutt, Kenneth D. Poteat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Shaw et al
as 5:2022ct03361
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Sgt. Fredrick Shaw, Corey D. Collins, Brenda J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Shaw
as 5:2022ct03313
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Fredrick Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Hanif El v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03272
Plaintiff:
Adisah Lacy Al-Hanif El and Fredrick Bennett
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canady v. Huneycutt et al
as 5:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Fredrick L. Canady
Defendant:
FNU Huneycutt, Marilyn M. Gamewell and L. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLEMMING v. USA
as 1:2022cv00161
Petitioner:
FREDRICK DEVONE FLEMMING
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sauer v. Stanley
as 5:2022hc02002
Petitioner:
Donald Fredrick Sauer and Don F. Sauer
Respondent:
Drew Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battle v. Warden of Craven Correctional Institution
as 5:2020ct03154
Defendant:
Warden of Craven Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Alan Battle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANADY v. POOLE et al
as 1:2018cv00370
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK L. CANADY
Defendant:
KATY POOLE, GEORGE S. WARREN, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
