Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Baldwin Park Free Speech Coali, et al v. City of Baldwin Park
as 20-55244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BALDWIN PARK FREE SPEECH COALITION, an unincorporated association and ROBERT A. EHLERS, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
Baldwin Park Free Speech Coalition et al v. City of Baldwin Park
as 2:2019cv09864
Plaintiff:
Robert A Ehlers and Baldwin Park Free Speech Coalition
Defendant:
City of Baldwin Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin Park Free Speech Coalition et al v. City of Baldwin Park, a muncipal corporation
as 2:2019cv09863
Plaintiff:
Robert A Ehlers and Baldwin Park Free Speech Coalition
Defendant:
City of Baldwin Park, a muncipal corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Institute for Free Speech v. Xavier Becerra
as 17-17403
Amicus Curiae:
THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE, FREE SPEECH COALITION and FREE SPEECH DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, FKA Center for Competitive Politics
Americans for Prosperity Found v. Xavier Becerra
as 16-55727
Amicus Curiae:
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS, STATE OF MICHIGAN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, in her Official Capacity as Attorney General of California and XAVIER BECERRA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of California
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION
Cox et al v. Godaddy et al
as 2:2013cv00962
Plaintiff:
Crystal L Cox
Defendant:
Bob Parsons Godaddy, Godaddy Incorporated, Peter L Michaelson and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Cox vs. Randazza, et al.,
as 2:2013cv00297
Defendant:
AOL Inc., APPLE, David S. Aman, OR and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal L Cox
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
