Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Lu v. Conley
as 17-1078
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and DANIEL F. CONLEY
Lu v. Niles We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv12220
Plaintiff: Friedrich Lu
Defendant: Iesha Niles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lu v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv14081
Plaintiff: Friedrich Lu
Defendant: Diane Smith, Thomas G. Robbins, Trustees of Boston University and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lu v. Commonwealth of Massaschusetts We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv13576
Plaintiff: Friedrich Lu
Defendant: Commonwealth of Massaschusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Lu v. Dalton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv13349
Plaintiff: Friedrich Lu
Defendant: Brian G. Dalton , Steven W. Tompkins , Fairfield Real Estate Management, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lu v. Doe
as 1:2015cv13344
Plaintiff: Friedrich Lu
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Lu v. Canton Corp., et al
as 15-1741
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant - Appellee: CANTON CORP., FAIRFIELD REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT CO., ALBERT OGISTE and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Lu v. Downie et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv11558
Plaintiff: Friedrich Lu
Defendant: Lyndia Downie, Rosemary Cashman, Fred Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Lu v. Walsh et al
as 1:2015cv10920
Plaintiff: Friedrich Lu
Defendant: Martin J. Walsh, William F. Sinnott, Eugene L. O'Flaherty and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lu v. Baker., Jr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv10615
Plaintiff: Friedrich Lu
Defendant: Charles D. Baker., Jr , Lauren M. Mitchell and Michael O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?