Cases 1 - 10 of 16
LOMBARDO et al v. 400 NORTH PARK ROAD ASSOCIATES et al
as 2:2018cv01870
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LOMBARDO, SR. and CAROL LOMBARDO
Defendant:
400 NORTH PARK ROAD ASSOCIATES, FIC RESTAURANTS, INC. and FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sears Roebuck and Co v. Friendly's International, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv30139
Plaintiff:
Sears Roebuck and Co
Defendant:
Friendly's International, Inc. , Friendly's Restaurants Franchise, LLC , Friendly Ice Cream Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv30019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vilchez v. Rappan Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04984
Defendant:
Down Mary, Friendly Ice Cream Corporation, Rappan Restaurant Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Vilchez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10516
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
SEIPLE v. FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv04201
Plaintiff:
DAVID SEIPLE
Defendant:
FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
