Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Radler v. Marx et al
as 1:2014cv13539
Plaintiff:
James Jay Radler
Defendant:
Marx, Frost, Carbonne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc., et al
as 1:2014cv13270
Plaintiff:
Charity Faulkner , Eugene Davis , Shirley Anderson and others
Defendant:
Fresenius U.S.A., Inc. , FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frost v. USA
as 1:2013cv12159
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlrissian Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McClain v. Cousins et al
as 1:2013cv10307
Plaintiff:
Randell McClain
Defendant:
Frank G. Cousins, Jr., Michael Marks, Michael Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-2405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKPORT, MA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-2405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MA ROCKPORT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Peerless Indemnity Insurance C, et al v. Frost
as 12-2370
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY and PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBBIN W. FROST
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MA ROCKPORT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
WITHAM v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 2:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
GLEN A WITHAM
Defendant:
ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE , ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , GUY DESJARDINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
