Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuentes-Rodriguez v. Donald Trump et al
as 4:2020cv01881
Defendant:
Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Fuentes-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Rivera-Fuentes et al
as 3:2019cv00105
Defendant:
Rolando Rivera-Fuentes and Rowland Trucking Company Inc
Plaintiff:
Allen Jacque Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Fuente et al v. Merrill (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Roque De La Fuente and Adanys Clerch
Defendant:
John H. Merrill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Demerin
as 4:2015cv01004
Plaintiff:
Jose A Fuentes
Defendant:
Kevin Demerin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00542
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cordova et al v. R&A Oysters, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00462
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Fuentes Cordova and Leobardo Morales Inclan
Defendant:
R&A Oysters, Inc., Rodney L. Fox and Ann P. Fox
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fuentes v. Bad Boy Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00726
Plaintiff:
Marco Fuentes
Defendant:
Textron, Inc. and BB Buggies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2007cv02012
Petitioner:
Maurilia Fuentes Hernandez and Maurilia Fuentes Hernandez
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Julie Meyers, Tonita Dupard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
White v. State of Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 2:2007cv00023
Defendant:
State of Alabama, T. A. Fuentes, Joseph Phelps and others
Plaintiff:
Moses White, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
