Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lombard v. City of North Richland Hills Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Wilton Irvon Lombard, Jr. and Wilton Irvon Lombard, Jr
Defendant:
City of North Richland Hills Police Department, Mayor Oscar Trevino of North Richland Hills, Snow Heights North, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reger v. Keller et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Presiding Judge Dean Rucker, Landon A. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Jay Reger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chance Bolen v Moore et al
as 5:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Chance D. Bolen
Defendant:
Jo'shae Ferguson-Worley, Kelly G Moore, Jeff Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv03038
Plaintiff:
Janet G Moore
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Moore v. Parker et al
as 9:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
Eric G Moore
Defendant:
Heath Parker, Joshua Clark and Nacogdoches County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
Larry G Moore , Raymond M Edwards , Prince A Hardin and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Moore v. Fite
as 6:2011cv00385
Plaintiff:
Brent G Moore
Defendant:
Kevin Fite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Criminal Court of Appeals et al
as 1:2009cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
Criminal Court of Appeals, Court of Appeals, District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Associated Acceptance, Inc. v. Moore
as 5:2008cv00481
Plaintiff:
Associated Acceptance, Inc. and Associated Acceptance, Inc.
Defendant:
Brett G. Moore
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Moore v. Astrue
as 4:2007cv00422
Plaintiff:
Donald G Moore
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
