Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Krasner v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc
as 23-1262
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jonathan Krasner
Defendant / Appellant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc, Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Martin v. Lasley et al
as 4:2023cv04490
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fred Martin
Defendant:
Lieutenant T. Lasley, Sergeant G. Rogers, Captain Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Julia Kim v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.
as 23-1905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIA KIM, DAVID SYDNEY, MARTIN NOVICK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC., BRUCE J. SCHANZER, GREGG A. GONSALVES and others
Martin Cicalla, Jr. v. Donna Rogers, et al
as 23-16014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN ANTHONY CICALLA, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNA G. ROGERS, ESTATE OF LEON ROGERS and PROJECT X IT PTY LTD.
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10023
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G. ROGERS SR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc v. Krasner
as 23-754
Petitioner:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc, Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalve and others
Respondent:
Jonathan Krasner, individually and on behalf of all others siilarly situated
Krasner v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06945
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Krasner
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Schanzer J. Bruce, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Krasner v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06945
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Krasner
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Schanzer J. Bruce, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
