Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Adams v. Speedy Recovery Inc
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Brandon G Adams
Defendant:
Speedy Recovery Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutchins v. Federal Bar Associations et al
as 3:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Barry Hutchins
Defendant:
Federal Bar Associations, American Bar Associations, Office of the Bar Council of Lawyers Referrals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Adams v. Whitworth
as 2:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Erin G Adams
Defendant:
Jennifer T Whitworth
Cross Defendant:
Mezrano Law Firm PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Adams v. Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles et al
as 2:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Brandon G Adams
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles and Clark County Office of District Attorney Family Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Adams v. Ferenbach et al
as 2:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Brandon G. Adams and Brandon G Adams
Defendant:
Cam Ferenbach, Brenda Weksler, Debra K. Kempi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clervrain v. Merrill et al
as 5:2021cv00675
Defendant:
John Merrill, Paul D Pate, Brian Bingman and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v. Brown et al
as 2:2021cv00979
Defendant:
Daniel H. Brown, Michele Giacalone, Harriet E. Raghnal and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon G Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Adams et al
as 2:2021cv00503
Plaintiff:
Brandon G. Adams
Defendant:
Blanca Martinez, Steven B Wolfson, K. Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Middlesex County, et al
as 2:2020cv02112
Plaintiff:
Brandon G Adams
Defendant:
Mathew Johnson, Crossmark, Daniel H Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
