Cases 21 - 30 of 1,660
Thomas Dean v. National Labor Relations Board
as 24-10436
Petitioner:
THOMAS GABRIEL DEAN
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
M. et al v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michaela M., Gabriel M., Kinley G. and others
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Azar and Jean W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nock, Gabriel v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv60144
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Brian Nock
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albert Young v. Rashaun Robinson, et al
as 24-10210
Plaintiff:
ALBERT DEMETRIUS YOUNG
Defendant:
RASHAUN ROBINSON, SARAFINO LOVETTO, GABRIEL BROOKS and others
USA v. Angel Palanco, et al
as 24-10257
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL GABRIEL PALANCO, HUMBERTO VASQUEZ DIAZ and OSVALDO GONZALEZ
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 8:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jennifer A. Broton and Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Broton
as 5:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jennifer A. Broton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marina Herrada-Gamonal, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10181
Petitioner:
MARINA HERRADA-GAMONAL, GINO L. MONTES-HERRADA and GABRIEL A. MONTES-HERRADA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bowen v. Prock et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Nathaniel Bowen
Defendant:
Prock, Pittman, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
