Cases 21 - 30 of 1,609
Eduardo Gabriel Guerrero-Martinez v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00210
Petitioner:
Eduardo Gabriel Guerrero-Martinez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Eric Doyle et al v. FKA Distributing Co. LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10807
Plaintiff:
Eric Doyle and Gabriel Contreras
Defendant:
FKA Distributing Co., LLC d/b/a HoMedics LLC, Walmart, Inc., FKA Distributing Co. LLC a Michigan limited liability company doing business as Homedics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
(HC) Guerrero-Martinez v. Warden
as 2:2023cv03005
Petitioner:
Eduardo Gabriel Guerrero-Martinez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Guillen v. Schleicher et al
as 1:2023cv01722
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Matthew Guillen
Defendant:
Tyler Schleicher, Edgar Galdamez and Jaime Orozco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keya Morgan v. County of Los Angeles District Attorneys Office et al
as 2:2023cv10474
Plaintiff:
Keya Morgan
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles District Attorneys Office, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Jeffrey C. Stodel, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
