Cases 31 - 40 of 72
eDekka LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00986
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ingeniador, LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01487
Plaintiff:
Ingeniador, LLC
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Smart Search Concepts LLC v. Gap Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01035
Plaintiff:
Smart Search Concepts LLC
Defendant:
Gap Inc. , Athleta Inc. , Banana Republic LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Desire LLC v. New York & Company Inc et al
as 2:2013cv04114
Plaintiff:
Desire LLC
Defendant:
Does, New York & Company Inc and The Gap Inc
Wireless Media Innovations LLC v. The Gap Inc.
as 1:2013cv00534
Plaintiff:
Wireless Media Innovations LLC
Defendant:
The Gap Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Princeton Digital Image Corporation v. Gap Inc.
as 1:2013cv00330
Plaintiff:
Princeton Digital Image Corporation
Defendant:
Gap Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Alexsam, Inc. v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Alexsam, Inc.
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc. and Direct Consumer Services, LLC
Counter_claimant:
The Gap, Inc. and Direct Consumer Services, LLC
Mediator:
Robert W Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jumbo Bright Trading Limited et al v. The Gap Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08932
Defendant:
Does and Gap Inc
Plaintiff:
Jumbo Bright Trading Limited and Charles Anthony Phillip Pozzi
Donna Morgan LLC v. Saks, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07623
Plaintiff:
Donna Morgan LLC
Defendant:
Urban Outfitters, Inc., Eminent Incorporated, Gap, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Alexsam, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores LP et al
as 3:2012cv00627
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc.
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores LP, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble Marketing Services Corp. and others
Objector:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
