Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Haynesworth v. Garvin et al
as 2:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Haynesworth
Defendant:
Leona Garvin, Ms. Dube, Lisa Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haynesworth v. Dube et al
as 2:2023cv05277
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Haynesworth
Defendant:
Dr. Michelle Dube, Dr. Leonka Garvin, Major Lisa Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04203
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
FRED GARZA, COLLIN DELP, JAMES O. DERRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Garvin v. Cohen
as 2:2022cv00994
Petitioner:
John Garvin
Respondent:
Warden LeVern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Dozier et al
as 9:2021cv03813
Plaintiff:
Harrell T Richardson
Defendant:
Vernetia Dozier, Arelia Mathis, Terrance Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Garvin v. Tisdale, Jr. et al
as 0:2020cv04403
Defendant:
William Burley III, Edward Tisdale, Jr., Michael McCall and others
Plaintiff:
John Garvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scruggs v. Riley et al
as 0:2020cv01014
Defendant:
Associate Wardeb Gary Lane, Yolanda Captain Brown, Sgt. Dewaun McKan and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Diane Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Garvin v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2019cv02201
Petitioner:
USA
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Plaintiff:
John Garvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Riley et al
as 0:2019cv00827
Defendant:
Captain Yolanda Brown, Lt. Tecorrie Garvin, Lt. Travis Pressley and others
Plaintiff:
James H. Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Riley et al
as 0:2019cv00826
Defendant:
Captain Yolanda Brown, Lt. Tecorrie Garvin, Lt. Travis Pressley and others
Plaintiff:
Lola Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
