Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Howard v. Trump Administration et al
as 7:2026cv00399
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Trump Administration, Keith Cox, Bobby Bain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Fucch et al
as 7:2025cv01903
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
C Fucch, Geoft Horen, University of Alabama, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Alabama Securities Commission et al
as 7:2025cv01293
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Alabama Securities Commission, Amanda Senn, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Howard v. Melinda Gates Foundation et al
as 7:2025cv01294
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Melinda Gates Foundation, Donald J Trump, Elon Musk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Powell
as 7:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Howard v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
James Young, Drew Wade, Andrew C Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gavin Howard v. James Young, et al
as 23-13643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAVIN HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK COLLARD, PICKENS COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK, PICKENS COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2023cv01346
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steven Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2023cv01275
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Jordan Powell and Keith Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
