Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ben Carter, et al v. ATM Vancom of Las Vegas, et al
as 09-15172
Plaintiff:
BEN CARTER, ESTEBAN MORA and IDA M. CLARK
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE E. SMITH, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
ATM VANCOM OF LAS VEGAS, BARRY GOLDSMITH, CHUCK KELLOGG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-17393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gene Smith, Sr. v. Roger Hunt
as 08-2100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE E. SMITH, SR., an incompetent person
Party-in-Interest - None:
IDA M. CLARK, Guardian for Gene E. Smith, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER L. HUNT, individually, JAMES C. MAHAN, individually, LAWRENCE R. LEAVITT, Individually and others
Gene E. Smith, Sr. v. William K. Suter, et al
as 08-5411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gene E. Smith, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Individual, Jeffrey Atkins, Individual, M. Blalock, Individual and others
SMITH v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv01526
Plaintiff:
GENE E. SMITH, SR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, JEFFREY ATKINS, M. BLALOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hunt et al
as 2:2008cv02068
Plaintiff:
Gene E Smith, Sr
Defendant:
Roger L Hunt, James C Mahan, Lawrence R Leavitt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gene Smith, Sr. v. Supreme Court of the United St, et al
as 08-5171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gene E. Smith, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Supreme Court of the United States, William K. Suter, Clerk, Jeffrey Atkins, Clerk and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SMITH v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, et al
as 1:2008cv00737
Plaintiff:
GENE E. SMITH, SR.
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, JEFFREY ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
