Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Purington et al v. General Motors Corporation
as 1:2008cv10094
Plaintiff:
Alison Purington, Alison Purington, Andrew Purington and others
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
RUSSELL v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv00173
Plaintiff:
LOIS E RUSSELL
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, CLIFTON ASSOCIATES INC, P S THORSEN COMPANY OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cross_claimant:
CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION , BUDD COMPANY and RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX CORPORATION, WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CORPORATION, RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION and others
Counter_claimant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION
Counter_defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX CORPORATION, WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CORPORATION, RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CHANCEY et al v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv00166
Plaintiff:
RHONDA CHANCEY and ALLAN COOMBS
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, CHRYSLER LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lastarza v. General Motors Corporation
as 1:2007cv00345
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lastarza
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
In Re: New Motor, et al
as 07-2257
:
NEW MOTOR VEHICLES NEW MOTOR VEHICLES CANADIAN EXPORT ANTITRUST LITIGATION, , and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JILLIAN R. WEADER, B. ALISON SHARRETT, JASON LEYNER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors Corporation, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors of Canada, Ltd., FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DAIMLERCHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION
Defeudis v. Imperial Chevrolet, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv40192
Plaintiff:
Linda Defeudis
Defendant:
Imperial Chevrolet, Inc. and General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Chinn v. General Motors Corporation
as 1:2007cv11249
Plaintiff:
Aaron Chinn
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
In Re: New Motor, et al, et al
as 07-2259
:
NEW MOTOR VEHICLES NEW MOTOR VEHICLES CANADIAN EXPORT ANTITRUST LITIGATION, , and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE JAYNES, JANE A. JAYNES, JILLIAN R. WEADER and others
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors Corporation, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors of Canada, Ltd., TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd., AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR, CO. INC., and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BASS FINEBERG LEAS BASS FINEBERG LEASING INC.
In Re: New Motor, et al, et al
as 07-2258
:
NEW MOTOR VEHICLES NEW MOTOR VEHICLES CANADIAN EXPORT ANTITRUST LITIGATION, , and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JILLIAN R. WEADER, B. ALISON SHARRETT, JASON LEYNER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors Corporation, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors of Canada, Ltd. and NISSAN NORTH AMERICA
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd., TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BASS FINEBERG LEAS BASS FINEBERG LEASING INC.
In Re: New Motor Veh, et al, et al
as 07-1990
Plaintiff:
BARRY COHEN, SARAH EPSTEIN and PHINEAS A ADLER
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SURI SKORSKI, ELI ELBAZ and SEAN GREGOR AND ASSOCIATES, CO., L.P.A.
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors Corporation, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR, CO. INC., and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, BASS FINEBURG, Bass Fineburg Leasing Inc., GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, General Motors Acceptance Corp. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
