Cases 11 - 20 of 448
Duggins v. The Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00056
Plaintiff:
Andrew Glen Duggins
Defendant:
Lieutenant FNU Geisinger, Major FNU Galindo, The Geo Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 5:2021cv00177
Defendant:
Dr. Ghazwan M. Kroma, University Hospital, United States Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Tremont D. Williams
Perez-Lopez v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00021
Defendant:
A.C.C.C. Washington MS., GEO Group Inc. and Great Plains CI
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Lopez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Lopez v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00017
Defendant:
A.C.C.C. Washington MS., Geo Group Inc. and Great Plains CI
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Aguilar-Hernandez v. Cole et al
as 4:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Wellpath, Warden D.C. Cole and GEO Group Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Aguilar-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00427
Defendant:
FNU Anderson, B Connelly, FNU Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald I Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foshee v. Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00426
Defendant:
FNU Cannelli, Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility, FNU Briscoe and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Foshee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charon v. USA et al
as 4:2020cv00073
Defendant:
Warden Cole, GEO Group Inc., SIS Madril and others
Plaintiff:
Iraelio Charon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nel v. Cole et al
as 4:2020cv00067
Defendant:
FNU Portillo, B. Collins, FNU Madrill and others
Plaintiff:
Jan Abraham Nel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foshee et al v. Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00375
Plaintiff:
Ray Hill, Floyd Foshee and Reginald I Parker
Defendant:
FNU Cannelli, Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility, FNU Briscoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
