Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Parks et al v. Ranger Energy Services, LLC et al
as 7:2019cv00184
Plaintiff:
Kustuss Phillips, George Garcia, John Parks and others
Defendant:
Mallard Completions, LLC and Ranger Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
David Russell v. Cameron County Sheriff, et al
as 18-40439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN CARILLO, Jailer, MIGUEL SANCHEZ, JR., Jailer, GEORGE GARCIA, Jailer Captain and others
Freddie George Garcia v. W.L. Montgomery
as 5:2017cv02025
Petitioner:
Freddie George Garcia
Respondent:
W. L. Montgomery
George Garcia v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv04398
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
George Garcia
Hamann v. Washington District 50 Schools et al
as 1:2017cv01253
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hamann
Defendant:
Washington District 50 Schools , Board of Education of Washington District 50 Schools , David Sherwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Raya et al v. Garcia et al
as 3:2017cv00244
Plaintiff:
Robert Raya , Michael Raya and Rosemary Raya
Defendant:
George Garcia and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
George Garcia v. Scott Kernan
as 17-55097
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN
George Garcia v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73064
Petitioner:
GEORGE GARCIA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv06073
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Frontini Simone, fu fanjie and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
