Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Timothy Pigford, et al v. Thomas Vilsack
as 13-5303
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Timothy C. Pigford, Lloyd Shafer, George Hall and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture
Claimant - Appellee:
Maurice McGinnis
Hall v. Brownrigg, et al
as 12-3211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOT BROWNRIGG, BOB MOEWS, PINNACLE HEALTH FACILITIES XVIII, L.P. and others
Hall v. Kansas Commission on Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2011cv02569
Plaintiff:
George Hall
Defendant:
Kansas Commission on Veterans Affairs , Wayne Bollig and Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Brownriggg et al
as 2:2011cv02448
Plaintiff:
George Hall
Defendant:
Scot Brownriggg, Bob Moews, Preferred Partner Management Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Fulton County Board et al
as 1:2010cv01423
Plaintiff:
Victoria Harper
Defendant:
Fulton County Board , Edward Ketchum , Bob Bucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Martin et al
as 2:2009cv02568
Defendant:
Joyce E. Martin and Garnett, Kansas, City of
Plaintiff:
George Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Evans et al
as 2:2009cv02155
Plaintiff:
George Hall
Defendant:
Vicki Evans, Colleen Butell, Craig A. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2007cv12306
Plaintiff:
Monica Miller
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Ella M. Bully-Cummings, George Hall, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hall et al v. Midfield, City of
as 2:2007cv00802
Plaintiff:
Debora George Hall and Sharon Smith Coleman
Defendant:
Midfield, City of and Midfield, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
