Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Markos v. International Business Machines, Corp.
as 1:2021cv09733
Plaintiff:
George Markos
Defendant:
International Business Machines, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Kofonis v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00688
Plaintiff:
George Markos Kofonis
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Kofonis v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv09578
Plaintiff:
George Markos Kofonis
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
HALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv00110
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JAMES SIBAN, DETECTIVE JAMES PRIADKA, POLICE OFFICER PETER MARINO and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWINE HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. MARKO et al
as 2:2009cv06161
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
GEORGE MARKO , JOSEPH KELLY , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv04193
Plaintiff:
NYGER PAGE, DAJA PAGE, NYA WEST and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GEORGE MARKO, JOSEPH KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ISAAC v. MITCHELL et al
as 2:2008cv02505
Plaintiff:
SUSAN P. ISAAC
Defendant:
DONTATE MITCHELL, GEORGE MARKO and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Universal World Church Inc et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
Universal World Church Inc, George Marko and Association of Religious Institutions for Freedom in Los Angeles
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
