Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Neely et al v. Intrusion Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00374
Defendant:
Intrusion Inc., Jack Blount and B. Franklin Byrd
Plaintiff:
George Neely and Joan Neely
Neely et al v. Intrusion Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00373
Defendant:
Intrusion Inc., Jack Blount and B. Franklin Byrd
Plaintiff:
George Neely and Joan Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Celeste v. Intrusion Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00307
Defendant:
Intrusion Inc., B. Franklin Byrd, Jack Blount and others
Plaintiff:
James Celeste and Andrew Bronstein
Consolidated Plaintiff:
George Neely and Joan Neely
Petitioner:
Esmond L. Dominick and John Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Neely v. Pfizer et al
as 1:2015cv09673
Plaintiff:
George Neely
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LORENZO et al v. JONES et al
as 2:2011cv01566
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL LORENZO, HAKIM EVANS and GEORGE NEELY
Defendant:
JONES, GARY M. LANIGAN, YATAURO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv03170
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv01551
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv01400
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
