Cases 11 - 20 of 54
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND v. GRAPHIC ARTS COLOR CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND , GEORGE TEDESCHI and MALCOLM PRITZKER
Defendant:
GRAPHIC ARTS COLOR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund et al v. AM & J Digital, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01248
Plaintiff:
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund , George Tedeschi and Malcolm Pritzker
Defendant:
AM & J Digital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381 E.R.I.S.A.
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND et al v. PEARL PRESSMAN LIBERTY COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05606
Plaintiff:
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND , GEORGE TEDESCHI , MALCOLM PRITZKER and others
Defendant:
PEARL PRESSMAN LIBERTY COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., NICE LINES DIRECT MAIL, INC., CRW GRAPHICS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
District Council 4 of the Graphic Communications v. Graphic Communications of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
as 1:2013cv07912
Plaintiff:
District Council Four of the Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters , Robert S. Miller and Frank W. Golden
Defendant:
Graphic Communications of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters , George Tedeschi , Robert Lacey and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Graphic Communications Confere, et al v. Bruce Printing, et al
as 13-3371
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONSCONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND, GEORGE TEDESCHI, Trustee and MALCOM PRITZKER, Trustee
Defendant:
BRUCE PRINTING
Respondent - Appellant:
FRANK M. CLARK, III
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund et al v. Neoprint, Inc.
as 1:2013cv12308
Plaintiff:
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund , George Tedeschi and Malcolm Pritzker
Defendant:
Neoprint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND et al v. PEARL PRESSMAN LIBERTY COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.
as 2:2013cv05213
Plaintiff:
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND , GEORGE TEDESCHI and MALCOLM PRITZKER
Defendant:
PEARL PRESSMAN LIBERTY COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund et al v. Fine Line Litho, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00538
Plaintiff:
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund , George Tedeschi and Malcolm Pritzker
Defendant:
Fine Line Litho, Inc., Antonia Orrecchio, Estate of Louis Lopardo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381 E.R.I.S.A.
Graphic Communications Conference of the IBT National Pension Fund v. Bruce Printing
as 1:2012cv01659
Plaintiff:
Graphic Communications Conference of the IBT National Pension Fund , George Tedeschi and Malcom Pritzker
Defendant:
Bruce Printing
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund, et al. v. Kestler Graphics, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00619
Plaintiff:
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund , George Tedeschi and Malcolm Pritzker
Defendant:
Kestler Graphics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
