Cases 1 - 10 of 60
In re: Shakka James
as 25-14257
Petitioner:
In re: SHAKKA SHANEAK JAMES
Respondent:
ELEANOR L. ROSS, J. ELIZABETH MCBATH, ZIP DELIVERY, LLC and others
Richardson v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2025cv06476
Plaintiff:
Danielle Richardson
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Barbara Riveria Holmes, Chris Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Olayeye
as 25-2022
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
YOMI JONES OLAYEYE, a/k/a Sabbie
Interested Party:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY, CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Navado Jones v. Attorney General, State of Georgia
as 24-11028
Petitioner:
NAVADO J. JONES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
