Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Chorinos v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00520
Plaintiff:
Athanasios Chorinos
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
McMillan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 9:2013cv02607
Plaintiff:
John Newton McMillan
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Georgia-Pacific Corporation Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Covington v. Georgia Pacific Corporation et al
as 7:2010cv00105
Plaintiff:
Mark Antoine Covington
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific Corporation, Michael Ward, Billy Boswell and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Smith v. Georgia Pacific Corporation
as 7:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Michael Alonza Smith
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Georgia Pacific Corporation et al
as 7:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
Henry Johnson Williams
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific Corporation, Rex Hiers and Kelly Palmer
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Nowlin v. Georgia Pacific LLC LifeChoices Benefits Program Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 4:2010cv01123
Plaintiff:
Judy G Nowlin
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific LLC LifeChoices Benefits Program Long Term Disability Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Puller v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00813
Plaintiff:
Cary O. Puller, III
Defendant:
Unisource Worldwide, Inc., Georgia-Pacific LLC and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harold Welch v. LifeChoices Plus Benefits Prog
as 08-1833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD NUBY WELCH
Defendant - Appellee:
LIFECHOICES PLUS BENEFITS PROGRAM, GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cress v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC et al
as 6:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Cress
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC and Georgia-Pacific, LLC, Salaried Pension Plan, #20000
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
