Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Parker v. Hutnak, et al.
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Noelle Clapham, Kimberly Hutnak, Phyllis Hutnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Highland Ridge Farm, LLC v. Town of Tiverton et al
as 1:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
Highland Ridge Farm, LLC
Defendant:
Town of Tiverton, Denise M DeMedeiros, Michael S. Burk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Accime v. Boston Medical Center et al
as 1:2020cv11518
Defendant:
Greg Leblac, Derrick Downs, Donna Petrozzi and others
Plaintiff:
Richie Accime
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gill v. Town of Marshfield et al
as 1:2020cv10431
Defendant:
Kevin Morris, Cristin Caufield, Philip Tavares and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jenkins et al v. Winik et al
as 1:2016cv11548
Plaintiff:
Hector M. Jenkins
Defendant:
Jeffrey Winik, Michael Neville, Paul Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
